Obviously the Nets in a hurry to tell that they sharpen controls and increases the log-peeping at t

As a photographer approached with evidence that stench far away, they could not find a problem, but when the case is now rayed in all media can suddenly find something good.
"We are shocked that there has been an abuse of confidential credit card information. This must not happen. Our study suggests that it is a criminal act carried out by a trusted employee of IBM, "
One is left with the impression that much of the security for the Nets is organized as a Potempkin-setting to get revisorene to nod vertical as cheaply as possible and that the only security they care about is their financial security.
Print
Actually, there are examples where companies have compensated because they have been banned from selling a poison that was banned at home in the United States. Or have received compensation after contaminated with oil. A tobacco company claimant Australia (I think it was) because of its anti-smoking campaign.
It is simply the Earth's thinnest explanation. You can not outsource responsibility. It's dishwasher not cleaning dishes still the Nets's responsibility dishwasher not cleaning dishes to take precautions against a rouge employee of a subcontractor. I am glad that it is not my chair, it says, shifting the liability. It must be pretty hot.
It's not quite the same. I would like to see that someone asked Nets direct - "Have Nets or any of the Nets subcontractors used versions of OpenSLL who Heartbleed Vulnerability in it?
The following press spin opinion, there is in my opinion the basis for putting an interpretation of the Nets do not think there is a problem because the security hole course did not seem to have been exploited "in the wild".
"The clear view is that the Nets and Nets services, including NemID not exposed, and we have not been, opposite the famous OpenSSL vulnerability known as Heartbleed that became dishwasher not cleaning dishes public last Tuesday," dishwasher not cleaning dishes he explains
Re: You forget
But must of course say that until now (thanks to politicians and digitization Agency) has worked fine just having some press staff to waving dishwasher not cleaning dishes his arms every time there has been criticism.
I think there are many who wish to see konkurrant to NemID and eBoks. Technically, it should not be that difficult. There must be a few servers dishwasher not cleaning dishes up, printed a few tokens, perhaps inte arranged dishwasher not cleaning dishes with a generic OTP service. There must of course also be a business model, so that some money while sending tokens out.
Nets were all warned of security problems 4 years ago, but "At Nets apologize to the fact that the audit report from 2010 was all about Easy ID system and not debit system." WTF?
For Super Villains battling forces of good in vain?
Completely according to plan, there is now smokescreen. dishwasher not cleaning dishes All that is reminiscent of detail hidden under the guise of being covered by a commercial contract with IBM and police investigation being conducted. Ku 'can then bargain just get profiled hush-hush source as an utterly unique super villain, then, it's real dandy.
It's dishwasher not cleaning dishes not like the hush-hush source has been sitting all alone in his super villains cave with his secret dishwasher not cleaning dishes super villains identity and its very own super secret villains computer. He has lived in Valby, met at work, chatted with colleagues and bosses, and he has moslet around with data on computers that others also had access and were able to look over his shoulder. dishwasher not cleaning dishes He has even openly posted his journalist relationships on Facebook.
The questions pile up. We are certainly many who really want to learn from this. In general, it is surely dishwasher not cleaning dishes interesting to know exactly how hush-hush the source has operated and how he has been able to dissimulate. dishwasher not cleaning dishes How sophisticated it has been? The very first guess as to who should be talking about database dishwasher not cleaning dishes triggers automatic SMS sending directly to the journalist's apparently overshot dishwasher not cleaning dishes the mark.
But why has he only occasionally been able to put new people on the "Watch List"? How has he avoided being caught up in internal controls or colleagues? Overall, there is probably no doubt that the Nets have run a fairly comprehensive change process - it has been an obstacle or a lever?
Obviously the Nets in a hurry to tell that they sharpen controls and increases the log-peeping at the trailing edge - but how was hush-hush source bulletin overlooked in the first place? Sloppiness or saving zeal?
This must be one of those applications where there are further proof-of-concept to a running system.
We have a strong indication that it only happened one time. But it is also a time too many. If there are others that we will beat thoroughly down on it. But there is nothing to suggest that this is the case, says Bo Pedersen.
Safe handling / understanding from the Nets were also