Because of this phase of the direct involvement in the political process is limited to the politica

This phase reveals inconsistencies essential structure as a foundation for social change melamine chopping boards through negotiations elite: on the one hand, the negotiation game, by necessity, require a majority rule of a given faction. To be effective, the negotiating team must be relatively small. On the other hand, "scale" of supporters (voters) of each elite ("base) melamine chopping boards or" depth "of support melamine chopping boards it is a very powerful bargaining fingers. Each elite, therefore, take care to nurture such support or, at least, invested a lot of resources into creating an image of "big base" of it. As Kuron, one of the leaders of Unite, told Castle: "We threaten each other with our facilities." [1] Thus, the logistical requirements for the exclusion, to continuously balances by certain forms of (purely symbolic, at least) of the inclusion melamine chopping boards (of the base). Moreover, if the whole process to get a wider legitimacy, at the conclusion of the negotiations, the logic of inclusion to a higher status in the logic of exclusion, a mechanism must be found to re-combine "social" in the change process. This can be achieved through a ritual of ingenuity. In summary, the resolution of this tension between exclusion and inclusion determining the final outcome of the play and the way that society melamine chopping boards its legacy will shape the further development.
It seems that the dynamic interplay of the basic exclusion and inclusion determine other characteristics of phase compensation in a social drama take on a scenario of negotiations.
The vision of the dominant polity in this phase is polar, but a picture of the enemy "can not be touched" was slowly melamine chopping boards replaced by a vision of an enemy as a trade partner amount. The negotiations are impossible without a forum to represent the common features. To create such a forum, many actors have taken actions aimed at discussing the discharge of the historical memory capable of exploding. Reykowski said:
Such conditions [conditions of successful negotiations - JK] but also very important is the principle does not discuss issues iconic. We have solved the future, and avoid arguing about the past. We believe, and I think most of us agree on this, that if we start working on the discussion of what is wrong in the past, we will not achieve anything. We have to accept the fact that we look at the different things from the past in different ways, and that we have different views of the iconic issue differently. There have been situations when someone has could not help put out such a problem, and then broke out emotions, but I think we have tried to unite undermine feelings of the negotiations. [2]
The vision of such a common feature, however, is not significant because of the nature of the image separately. Otherwise, a sense of "sell out" even then either "become depraved" emerging between the "base," and some critics began dialogue presents a narrative about the betrayal. [3] As a result, a determined look, the poles in the field of social-political replaced by a vague picture, dimly elite, but the array of people that previously now completely separate overlapping slightly.
Because every elite had to position themselves before two different audiences, in front of the elite and those who go on its own, one would expect that they have tried to master the art of making other identities different, depending on the situation. Even skim party materials melamine chopping boards and different melamine chopping boards statement verifying this hypothesis. On the party-state have discovered three discourse (language) different identities:
This identity is expressed in an idiom and ideology are used mainly for external consumption. [6] Notably in 1989, insofar as best I can judge, the ardent ideological discourse has decreased, compared to the previous year in Poland and the discourse "Official: Party of Czechoslovakia or East Germany. The pragmatic discourse of this ideology was created melamine chopping boards by the leadership of the Workers' Party of Poland confirm the point that they are the closest allies of Gorbachev in Eastern Europe.
Because of this phase of the direct involvement in the political process is limited to the political melamine chopping boards exclusion (who is in, who is omitted, one such decisions) are impor- terribly important. The main reason for this is that certain could happen next: in the post-compensation, the politics of exclusion phase compensation became the subject of a symbolic war stress on performance Award.